Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
60-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

60-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029818 50.867187)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029790 50.867184,-1.029791 50.867190,-1.029795 50.867195,-1.029801 50.867199,-1.029818 50.867202,-1.029835 50.867199,-1.029841 50.867195,-1.029847 50.867185,-1.029845 50.867179,-1.029841 50.867174,-1.029827 50.867167,-1.029819 50.867166,-1.029810 50.867167,-1.029795 50.867174,-1.029791 50.867179,-1.029790 50.867184)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL